Corporate Conservatives cause alll these citizens to lose Billions.
Barney Frank passed regulations to keep Fannie and Freddie in check, but it was too late. Barney Frank would have saved Fannie and Freddie if he were head of the Finance Committee before 2007.
The lesson to be learned: To save the economy, we need more Government regulations in businesses to protect corporations from losing their money like Fannie and Freddie lost.
Obama’s policies are the reason America is not going through a Depression. If Obama didn’t pass regulations, imagine how many other corporations would have gone bankrupt.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is the perfect example of how evil capitalism can be.
That is why Barnie Frank wanted regulations and independent oversight to keep these organizations from making risky illogical sub-prime mortgage lendings to people not in a position to repay those loans.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had they followed the rules, they would have not given bonuses to their top executives in the years leading up to bankruptcy
At the time of these video hearings it was Late 2004 and the issue was not about regulating Fannie and Freddie, it was about how the Republicans were going about doing it with the goal of corrupting it so they got money out of it
These Democrats wouldn’t be this angry, something is twisted in these videos, you think they would lobby vigorously to protect a corporation???
I still hold the Conservatives more responsible because Wall Street was the driving force behind the magnitude of the loans.
OF COURSE ANY POOR PERSON would want an opportunity VS. NO opportunity to own a home. Clinton and the Democrats wanted a program to help poor people obtain loans with poorer credit scores, but with regulation over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. This means they would be some other channel (perhaps a petition process) poor people denied loans could go through to make the case they can be trusted with a mortgage. However, it is not the homeowner’s responsiblity to assess the risk of Fannie Mae, that’s in Wall Street’s hands.
What Clinton wanted to lax up was the impact of clear cut credit score and income as a basis for judging who can and can’t get a loan. This doesn’t necessarily mean a poor person who is at risk of not paying back can’t get one. You’d just have to open the door to other means of risk measurement besides sheer income.
Technorati Tags: barney frank, barnie frank, billions, capitalism, conservatives, credit scores, driving force, fannie mae, fannie mae and freddie mac, finance committee, freddie mac, government regulations, independent oversight, magnitude, obama, poor person, reason america, republicans, sub prime mortgage, top executives